How Low Will It Go?

Kinja'd!!! "JR1" (type35bugatti)
10/16/2018 at 13:19 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!2 Kinja'd!!! 14
Kinja'd!!!

How much will a base 340hp F-Type eventually be worth when it hits rock bottom on depreciation curve?


DISCUSSION (14)


Kinja'd!!! winterlegacy, here 'till the end > JR1
10/16/2018 at 13:34

Kinja'd!!!3

The F-type is one of my favorite Jags of all time, especially in bright orange, and especially  as a convert ible.


Kinja'd!!! Stapleface > JR1
10/16/2018 at 13:38

Kinja'd!!!1

Just a wild guess, but I’ll say 12-15k. 


Kinja'd!!! Milky > JR1
10/16/2018 at 13:40

Kinja'd!!!0

$10k in 2035.

I look forward to finding this post 2 decades from now to see how close I was.


Kinja'd!!! facw > JR1
10/16/2018 at 13:53

Kinja'd!!!0

Well, you can find decent looking XK8s (which was significantly more expensive at launch (inflation adjusted) than the F-Type from what I can tell), starting around $5000, and tons below $10,000 (some are as low as $3000) . If we assume that they will depreciate similarly, they’ll bottom out around $7,500 to $15,000 (again taking inflation into account, things will be more expensive then). Of course if they are seen as reliable, they might not decline as steeply, but we are talking about a Jaguar, so what’s the chance of that?


Kinja'd!!! ITA97, now with more Jag @ opposite-lock.com > JR1
10/16/2018 at 14:03

Kinja'd!!!1

Part of me thinks this will depend on long-term reliability and repair costs. If these follow the historical running costs and not recommended as an only car reliability of used jags, then I think they’ll end up sub 20 k, cross shopped with a 10-15 year old corvette category for a fun weekend car at some point.   If they manage to prove reli able and don’t require huge sums of money to keep running beyond consumables, I think they might be pretty enough and special enough to stay pretty valuable.


Kinja'd!!! JR1 > facw
10/16/2018 at 14:51

Kinja'd!!!0

I tend to agree but at the same time I wonder if the name f-type will inherently give it high  value on the used market.


Kinja'd!!! JR1 > Milky
10/16/2018 at 14:51

Kinja'd!!!1

I think I could agree to that (inflation adjusted)


Kinja'd!!! feather-throttle-not-hair > JR1
10/16/2018 at 15:34

Kinja'd!!!0

Base? Why base?

I’d think the S would be similarly priced and after a year or two those got a manual.

Manual F Type > all other F types


Kinja'd!!! facw > JR1
10/16/2018 at 18:29

Kinja'd!!!1

I don’t really think so. I don’t feel like the E-type mythos has rubbed off on it. And certainly just being a “type” has done nothing for the X-type and S-type. The F-type is a cool car, but then so was the XK. I think the big factor is going to be how much people feel like they are going to have to spend to maintain them as they age.


Kinja'd!!! The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock > Milky
10/16/2018 at 18:37

Kinja'd!!!0

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! Milky > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock
10/16/2018 at 19:12

Kinja'd!!!0

Haha, this a reminder on Android?

I appreciate the effort you took to get to 2038.  


Kinja'd!!! The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock > Milky
10/16/2018 at 19:32

Kinja'd!!!1

Find out in 20 years. 


Kinja'd!!! JR1 > feather-throttle-not-hair
10/16/2018 at 19:54

Kinja'd!!!0

I was just trying to determine what would be lowest of the low 


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > JR1
10/31/2018 at 16:09

Kinja'd!!!0

I bet in 15-20 years you can have one for under $12k